The Microsoft Ecosystem Lock-In Problem
Microsoft Purview AI Hub launched as an extension of the existing Purview compliance suite, designed to give Microsoft 365 administrators visibility into how employees interact with Microsoft Copilot and Azure OpenAI Service. Within that scope, it works: sensitivity labels propagate, data classification applies, and activity logs feed into the unified Microsoft 365 audit infrastructure.
The problem is that enterprise AI usage does not live inside a single vendor's ecosystem. Research consistently shows that organisations use an average of 3–5 AI providers simultaneously. Marketing teams adopt Claude for long-form content. Engineering teams run open-source models on internal infrastructure. Product teams experiment with Gemini. Customer support deploys specialised AI tools with embedded models. Every one of these interactions falls completely outside Purview's visibility.
Areebi was built for this reality. As a provider-agnostic AI control plane, Areebi governs every AI interaction - regardless of which model, which provider, or which deployment model is in use. This is not a feature difference; it is an architectural difference. Purview extends Microsoft compliance to Microsoft AI. Areebi provides AI governance across the entire organisation's AI footprint.
Data Classification Is Not AI Governance
Purview AI Hub's core capability is extending Microsoft's data classification framework - sensitivity labels, data types, trainable classifiers - to AI interactions within the Microsoft ecosystem. This is valuable for understanding what data is being exposed to Copilot, but it addresses only one dimension of AI governance.
Complete AI governance requires answering a broader set of questions: Who is authorised to use which models for which purposes? What happens when a policy violation is detected - is the interaction blocked, masked, or escalated? Can the organisation prove to a regulator exactly why a specific decision was made? What unsanctioned AI tools are employees using outside approved channels? How much is each department spending on AI, and against which budgets? These questions require a purpose-built governance platform, not a classification extension.
Areebi delivers classification and DLP as one of 14 governance capabilities, alongside a policy engine, decision authority controls, decision provenance, incident replay, shadow AI discovery, model registry, output enforcement, compliance automation, and a governed AI workspace. The gap between "we can label data" and "we can govern AI" is the gap between Purview and Areebi.
Multi-Cloud, Multi-Model: The Enterprise AI Reality
Microsoft's pitch is compelling if you assume all AI usage runs through Azure. But enterprise procurement data tells a different story. Organisations are deliberately pursuing multi-provider AI strategies to avoid vendor lock-in, optimise cost, and match models to use cases. A legal team might require Claude for nuanced contract analysis. A data science team might deploy Llama on internal GPUs for sensitive workloads. A customer experience team might use a vertical AI tool powered by a model you have never heard of.
Purview cannot govern what it cannot see. It has no visibility into non-Microsoft AI services, no mechanism to enforce policies on third-party models, and no way to detect shadow AI usage across the dozens of AI-powered SaaS applications entering the enterprise. This is not a limitation that Microsoft will fix - it is a structural constraint of building governance into a vendor-specific platform.
Areebi sits at the control plane layer, above any individual provider. It integrates with Microsoft AI services (including Copilot and Azure OpenAI), and equally with Anthropic, Google, Mistral, Cohere, and self-hosted open-source models. One policy engine, one audit trail, one compliance framework - across every AI interaction in the organisation. For enterprises navigating EU AI Act requirements or HIPAA obligations, this unified view is not optional.
Deployment Flexibility vs E5 Licensing Requirements
Microsoft Purview AI Hub requires Microsoft 365 E5 licensing (or E5 Compliance add-on) and Azure infrastructure. For organisations already at E5, this means Purview AI Hub is "included" - but "included" means bundled, not free. E5 licensing runs $57/user/month, and the AI governance capabilities are a fraction of what that license covers. Organisations pay for the entire E5 bundle to access AI-specific features.
More critically, Purview AI Hub is cloud-only and Microsoft-only. Organisations with on-premise requirements, air-gapped environments, or multi-cloud mandates cannot use it. Defence contractors, healthcare systems, financial institutions with data sovereignty requirements, and government agencies frequently need governance infrastructure that deploys within their own boundary - not in a vendor's cloud.
Areebi deploys anywhere: your VPC, on-premise, air-gapped, or as a managed cloud service. There is no prerequisite infrastructure, no bundled licensing, and no vendor ecosystem requirement. A 200-person organisation pays $48,000–$84,000/year for the complete AI governance platform - compared to $136,800/year just for the E5 licensing that enables Purview AI Hub (before Azure costs). See transparent pricing or request a demo to compare directly.
Frequently Asked Questions
We already have Microsoft 365 E5 - isn't Purview AI Hub free for us?
Purview AI Hub is included in E5 licensing, but it only governs Microsoft Copilot and Azure OpenAI interactions. If your organisation uses any non-Microsoft AI - Claude, Gemini, open-source models, or AI-powered SaaS tools - Purview provides zero visibility or governance for those interactions. Areebi governs all AI usage, including Microsoft services, under one platform. Most E5 organisations find that Purview covers less than 40% of their actual AI footprint.
Can Areebi work alongside Microsoft Purview for Microsoft-specific AI?
Yes. Areebi integrates with Microsoft identity (Entra ID), and can operate alongside Purview for organisations that want to maintain Microsoft compliance workflows. However, most customers find that Areebi's governance capabilities supersede what Purview offers even for Microsoft AI services - Areebi provides real-time enforcement, granular policy controls, and audit-ready evidence that Purview's post-hoc classification cannot match.
Does Purview AI Hub provide real-time DLP for AI interactions?
Purview AI Hub primarily provides post-interaction classification and labelling rather than real-time inline enforcement. It can identify that sensitive data was shared with Copilot, but it does not block or mask that data before it reaches the model. Areebi provides real-time inline DLP - detecting, masking, or blocking sensitive data before it reaches any AI model, with configurable actions per policy rule.
What about organisations that are standardised on Microsoft for everything?
Even all-Microsoft organisations typically have AI usage beyond Copilot - employees use ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, and dozens of AI-powered SaaS tools. Shadow AI is the norm, not the exception. Areebi discovers and governs this usage while Purview cannot. For the Microsoft AI interactions Purview does see, Areebi still provides deeper governance: real-time enforcement, policy engine, decision provenance, and compliance-mapped evidence.
How long does it take to deploy Areebi compared to Purview AI Hub?
If you already have E5 licensing, Purview AI Hub activates quickly for Microsoft AI services - but you still have no governance for non-Microsoft AI. Areebi deploys in 2–4 weeks for full enterprise coverage across all AI providers. The deployment includes policy configuration, identity integration, DLP rule setup, and compliance framework mapping. Most organisations achieve broader AI governance coverage with Areebi in the same time it takes to properly configure Purview's sensitivity labels.
Related Resources
Ready to switch from Microsoft Purview AI Hub?
Migration support included
Get a personalized demo and see how Areebi compares for your specific requirements.